Comparing outcomes of modern cementless knee implant with standard knee replacement surgery

Cementless knee substitute, an substitute solution to traditional cemented knee substitute operation, is garnering curiosity in the discipline of orthopedic medical procedures. Scientists at Clinic for Specific Surgical treatment (HSS) introduced a research to review results of a contemporary cementless knee implant to the regular knee implant that needs bone cement for fixation.

HSS hip and knee surgeon Geoffrey H. Westrich, MD, and his colleagues uncovered no change in clinic size of keep, problems, medical center readmission inside of 90 days of medical procedures, or fees of revision surgical procedure at two-12 months patient observe-up. The findings have been introduced today at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2022 Once-a-year Meeting in Chicago.

With respect to time expended in the working place (OR), researchers found that making use of the cementless implant diminished OR time by 25%, preserving an average of 27 minutes.


In a cementless full knee replacement, you do not have to hold out for the cement to harden and dry like you do in a cemented knee substitution.”


Brian P. Chalmers, MD, hip and knee surgeon at HSS and study co-author


“Lessened time in the OR underneath anesthesia is beneficial to sufferers, but that is not the only likely gain of the cementless prosthesis,” added Dr. Westrich, who is also the investigate director emeritus of the Adult Reconstruction and Joint Alternative Support at HSS. “With the cementless knee alternative, the components are push in good shape into spot for ‘biologic fixation,’ which mainly usually means the bone will improve into the implant. If there is preliminary biologic fixation, implant loosening above time should be considerably less possible and a complete knee alternative could possibly past a great deal lengthier.”

In a traditional knee substitution, implant elements are secured in the joint making use of bone cement. It’s a tried-and-legitimate strategy that has worked effectively for many years. But ultimately, above time, the cement begins to loosen from the bone and/or the implant. When it wears out or loosens, people generally need to have a next knee replacement, acknowledged as a revision surgical procedures.

Dr. Westrich believes that a very well-built cementless implant will make loosening more than time much less likely, enabling a full knee substitute to past considerably more time. Implant longevity is an important thought, in particular for young sufferers with arthritis who decide for joint replacement to sustain their lively life-style. They usually place extra needs on their joint, producing a lot more wear and tear and prospective loosening. The cemented knee implant employed in a conventional joint substitution typically lasts 15 to 20 yrs.

“Cementless implants have been utilized successfully in whole hip alternative medical procedures for quite a few many years. It has been a great deal much more demanding to establish a cementless prosthesis that would get the job done well in the knee because of the knee’s unique anatomy,” Dr. Westrich spelled out.

“In the earlier, a amount of cementless knee implants were being demonstrated to have style flaws, with loosening from the tibia,” he included. “The newer cementless prosthesis utilised in our research did not display this type of loosening as in earlier revealed research. We set out to see how the implant fared in HSS patients.”

Researchers reviewed 598 primary unilateral full knee replacements at HSS (170 cementless and 428 cemented) of the similar style from 2016 to 2018. Demographic information and facts, operative facts and any difficulties ended up obtained from patients’ medical information. Individuals undergoing the cementless method have been more youthful general, with a indicate age of 63, as opposed to 68 for those people acquiring a regular cemented knee alternative. Great bone high-quality is crucial in the achievements of cementless knee fixation. Therefore, orthopedic surgeons preferentially pick youthful individuals for the cementless technique, Dr. Chalmers mentioned.

There was no statistically major distinction in healthcare facility length of stay, troubles, or healthcare facility readmission for a dilemma in the very first 90 days right after medical procedures. Ninety-6 % of cementless knee replacement sufferers vs . 95% of individuals with a cemented knee alternative managed their implant devoid of the will need for revision medical procedures at two-yr follow-up.

“The biggest query now is no matter if or not cementless full knee substitution will have better extensive-phrase toughness and fixation than cemented knee substitution,” Dr. Chalmers explained. “Subsequent these individuals to evaluate very long-phrase outcomes is the upcoming action.”

You may also like